David

Hot Dance Philosophy

Hot Dances

Adapted from a letter (1999) to a dance
organizer in another community; his organizing committee was hotly debating
what sort of dance should be encouraged

What is the vision of the series?

Let me add right away that this isn’t
just my question—it’s the one that was put forward by Larry Jennings over
several decades. (In fact, I think that pushing this question was one of
Larry’s most important contributions to the dance world; he obviously made it
part of my consciousness.

Some of the answers to the vision thing may come
as you and your committee discuss whether your aim is to build a community
dance or a so-called dance community.

For Love or Money

For Love or Money

Adapted from several posts and letters to caller friends
over the years

Bill Martin wrote:

> If a dance looks
like it will be a real party –
> “great music and huge crowds of enthusiastic
dancers” – I would pay to play!

Other musicians and callers have touched in recent postings
on their reasons for playing or calling. Some in the dance community are trying
to earn a livelihood from their work; for most of us, it is something we do on
the side.

Demo vs. Words

Demonstrations
vs. Words

Adapted
from a rec-folk-dancing post (1998) in response to a dancer who said that
callers should stay at the microphone rather than coming onto the floor to
demonstrate figures.

> The only figure that must be demonstrated is the courtesy turn.
That’s also the figure that’s hardest for new dancers to learn.

Hmm…  it IS one of the figures
I demonstrate most often, partly to show an alternative to the twirls and
partly to demonstrate how folks can connect via eye contact to turn what might
otherwise seem a boring filler for the men into a fun figure for all.

The most common reason I jump down from the stage to demonstrate a
figure (which I do far more often than asking dancers on the floor to demo
something) is to make a point about styling.

Creating a Vision

Creating a Vision

adapted from an e-mail (2003) to an organizer dealing
with strident demands by a few dancers for more challenging dances

What you’re going through isn’t unique to your series. It’s
happened at most contra dance series with which I’m familiar, and for that
matter, a similar thing happened in the modern western square dance movement,
both in the early 1960s and again more recently. There seems to be a tendency
for a small group of active dancers—what Ralph Sweet once labeled the "overactive
10%"—to try to make things fit their own view of how dancing should be,
which leads to the gradual—or not-so-gradual—exclusion of just plain folks who
like to dance but perhaps not as often as the others.

Virtues of Inactivity

The Virtues of Inactivity

adapted from a post to rec.folk.dancing, 2003

A caller wrote, discussing dancing a few decades back: "The
actives often got to swing when the inactives didn’t; they went down the hall
and back while the inactives waited, that sort of thing."

That single word "waiting" doesn’t do justice to the many
possibilities open to the inactives in these older dances:

• They get to talk to each other, and not just those interrupted
conversations that we have with a partner in the more modern dances, where you
get a few beats of conversation before you’re off somewhere else again.

Caller Leadership

Caller Leadership

adapted from a 2011 post and an exchange with a caller friend

On one of the caller listservs to which I belong came this comment: “I would be interesting to hear how other callers incorporate other formations in their programs and how they and the dancer feel about it…”

Most of the responses, mine included, spoke to what we as callers do in our programs and why. Embedded in our answers is the reality of being hired professionals at the mercy of the dance organizers and subject to local customs. For example, one caller wrote: “My region is not very square-friendly, at least not at a contra dance. … So given the local atmosphere, I stick to mostly improper and Becket contra dances.”

The Big Question hidden behind all of our responses so far is, “To what extent should callers select a program based on the wishes of the dancers?” Granted, unless one meets those expectations at least in part, one will have a hard time getting hired again. I’m well aware of that reality.

Hot Modern Moves

Hot Modern Moves

Written in 2003, but still
applicable, alas, to today’s dance scene…

I was calling recently in a large
city for an evening of contra dancing and a guy comes up to me afterwards with
nice comments about the evening. We get to talking and he mentions in passing
that I’m quite a “traditional caller.”

“Thanks,” I say, and upon reflection,
I consider that perhaps this wasn’t meant as a compliment. I ask him, “But what
do you mean by ‘traditional?’ ”

He explains that there’s a
genuineness in my calling and that I seem to respect the dances a lot. I’m
happy to hear this, and I explain to him that I live New Hampshire, where
there’s a long tradition of contra dancing, and I do try to respect that
tradition.

Where’s the Partner Swing?

Where’s the partner swing?

Adapted from a post to rec.folk-dancing
in 2004

A few weeks ago, when one couple at the
head of the set asked me that very question—I was happy to note that they were
smiling as they spoke—I referred them to Section III, Subsection 2, paragraph
A(5) of the Caller-Dancer Compact, which simply states that a pair of dancers
who feel that a particular dance doesn’t give them enough swings together may
remain as partners for the next dance.

Callers (contra callers as well as
modern western square dance callers) have been dealing with the overactive 10%
subgroup for a long time; this is not just a contemporary issue. (I suspect
that it’s probably the same in the international folk dance community, where
some folks who dance a lot are wanting programs with lots of more complex
Balkan dances while others are content to have more variety.)

> actives crossing over before the
caller says to do so

and others wrote to say, "What’s
the problem?"

Why Dance?

Why dance?

adapted from an essay prepared for the Smithsonian
Festival of American Folklife, 1999

Growing up, I never felt comfortable dancing. I was one of
those guys who stood on the sidelines in junior high school, waiting for the
slow numbers where I could shuffle my feet awkwardly while clutching a partner.
In college, I danced to rock music in large part because my girlfriend liked to
dance and I wanted to be with her.

Discovering contra dance in the 1970s was a revelation. I
liked folk music already, and this dance music felt familiar, that foot-tapping
sound of the fiddles backed up by solid rhythm. Great music, friendly people,
and a logical flow to the dances all combined to provide a satisfying way of
moving to music.

alt

Contra Dance Disapora

Contra Dance diaspora: A collection of stories about the spread of contra dancing

altHow this collection came to be: My work on the Bob McQuillen documentary, Paid To Eat Ice Cream, helped me realize how many stories of the previous generations of dancers had been lost. The New England Folk Festival one year held a “Remembering Ralph Page” session that attracted fewer than two dozen participants. Some potential participants were committed to other workshops at that same time, to be sure, but many of the people who had danced to Ralph Page simply were no longer alive. As I continued to search for photographs and films and stories from earlier eras of traditional squares and contras, I resolved that no matter what I was able to locate, at least I could ensure that more recent generations left a better record of their involvement.